Abstract
The present work contributes to the debate on the conceptual and meaning dispute of the popular economies. This reflection process is based on the results of semi-structured interviews and participant observation of popular economy projects in Jalisco, which I analyze through political economy categories to understand the different levels of subsumption to the capitalist production system. As a conclusion of the work, I make visible that, within the material sphere, the experiences of the popular economy with a greater organic composition of capital, such as the tire cooperative, have a real subsumption to the system, while those initiatives with a low composition, such as agroecological initiatives, are formally subsumed under it.